The bill gives the Board the power to, in the first two years of GHG allowance trading program, increase the amount of allowance that covered entities may borrow, but only in the event that the average daily closing price of an emissions allowance exceeds the upper range predicted by the Congressional Budget Office prior to the start of the program. In subsequent years, the Board will have the power to: (1) temporarily increase the amount that covered entities can borrow, lengthen the payback period of loans, and/or lower the interest rate on loans; and, in the event of more extreme economic circumstances, (2) to temporarily expand the total number of allowances in the economy, provided that subsequent years’ caps are tightened sufficiently to ensure that cumulative emissions reductions over the long term remain unchanged. The Board is only to use these powers as needed to avoid significant harm to the economy.
This bill is intended to serve as a cost containment amendment for any GHG cap-and-trade bill brought to the full Senate.
NOTE: For a full range of Pew Center resources for Lieberman-Warner, including in depth analysis, a longer summary, a complete timeline, and links to relevant external documents and media, please click here
The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (L-W CSA). This bill would establish a cap-and-trade program within the United States requiring a 70% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from covered sources, which represent over 80% of total U.S. emissions. The bill as amended also includes complementary policies, such as a low carbon fuel standard and provisions aimed at enhancing energy efficiency. Taken together, the bill’s sponsors believe these provisions will reduce overall U.S. GHG emissions roughly 63% by 2050.
The L-W CSA divides the six GHGs into two categories: Group I (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, and perfluorocarbons) and Group II (hydrofluorcarbons). For all GHGs, the bill uses the common unit of measurement CO2 equivalent (CO2e)—the quantity of GHGs that the U.S. EPA has determined makes the same contribution to global warming as one metric ton of CO2. The L-W CSA would create two separate caps, one covering facilities that produce HFCs and the other covering facilities that:
· Use more that 5,000 tons of coal annually;
· Process, produce, or import natural gas;
· Produce or import petroleum or coal-based fuel that when combusted will emit a Group I GHG;
· Produce for sale or distribution or import more than 10,000 CO2e of chemicals that are group I GHGs, assuming no capture or permanent sequestration
· Emit as a by-product of HCFC production more than 10,000 CO2e of HFCs
Overall, the two caps combined are expected to cover over 80% of total U.S. GHG emissions, although some process related emissions are not covered.
The cap on facilities producing HFCs would start in 2010 at 300 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) and decline to 90 MMTCO2e by 2037, remaining at that level through 2050. Emissions from all other covered facilities would be capped at 5775 MMTCO2e in 2012, with this cap decreasing annually to 1732 MMTCO2e in 2050. The two caps combined would result in roughly a 19% reduction from 2005 levels in 2020 and a 70% reduction from 2005 levels by 2050.Beginning in 2012 and continuing through 2030, the L-W CSA would provide transition assistance in the form of free allowances to electric power generators (19%), manufacturers (10%), fuel producers or importers (2%), HFC producers and importers (2%), and rural electric cooperatives (1%). In addition, 5% of the total emission allowance account will be allocated to early actors from 2012-2017 and 4% for carbon, capture and sequestration activities from 2012-2030. Approximately 30.5% of the total allowance account will be set aside from 2012-2050 for other entities, including states, load-serving entities, farms and forests, coal mines, and others. Starting in 2012, 26.5% of allowances would be auctioned (including 5% for an early auction to be held shortly after enactment), with the proceeds going to energy technology deployment, low-and middle-income energy consumers, adaptation efforts in the U.S., and programs to support energy independence and national security. Over time, the auction will grow so that by 2031, 69.5% of the allowances would be auctioned and the revenue used for these purposes.
The L-W CSA allows covered facilities to satisfy up to 15% of their compliance obligation with specific domestic offsets. An additional 15% can be covered using international emission allowances. Unlimited banking is allowed and owners and operators of covered facilities can borrow up to 15% of their annual compliance obligation from future years. The L-W CSA also creates a Carbon Market Efficiency Board to monitor the carbon trading market and implement specific cost relief measures, including increased borrowing and use of offsets.
The L-W CSA includes a review of the commitments of other major-emitting nations to reduce their GHG emissions. Eight years after enactment the President is authorized to require importers of GHG emission-intensive products from countries that have not taken action comparable to the U.S. to submit credits equal to those required of domestic manufactures.
11/1/07: Reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Private Sector and Consumer Solutions to Global Warming by 4-3; 12/5/08: Reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works by 11-8.
The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008
NOTE: For a full range of Pew Center resources for this bill, including in depth analysis, a longer summary, a complete timeline, and links to relevant external documents and media, please click here
· The Act, if enacted into law, would establish a market-based cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States, and establish other measures to reduce GHG emissions.
· This is the first cap-and-trade legislation to proceed to the Senate floor through regular order—that is, through the committee process. A previous version of this bill, then titled S.2191, was passed 11-8 by the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee in December 2007. The version that will debated on the Senate floor has been extensively revised from the version passed by the EPW committee.
· An estimated 87% of U.S. GHG emissions would be subject to the bill’s cap-and-trade program. Those required to submit emissions allowances under the program include: coal-fired power plants and other entities that use more than 5,000 metric tons of coal, natural gas processors and importers, petroleum processors and refiners, manufacturers and importers of more than 10,000 metric tons of GHGs (as measured in CO2 equivalents), and any entity that emits more than 10,000 metric tons (CO2e) of HFCs as a byproduct of the manufacture of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). The bill establishes a separate cap-and-trade system for HFCs produced or imported (including those in products and equipment).
· The cap-and-trade program would reduce GHG emissions from covered sectors by 4% below 2005 levels by 2012; 19% below 2005 levels by 2020; and 71% below 2005 levels by 2050.
· The bill would allocate 75.5% of all allowances for free in 2012— including 18% to power plants, 11% to manufacturers, 2% to petroleum refiners, and 0.75% to natural gas processors (transitioning to zero in 2031); 12.75% to electricity and natural gas local distribution companies for the benefit of energy consumers, and 15% to states, etc. The proportion of allowances auctioned would increase from 24.5% in 2012 to 58.75% by 2032.
· The bill would establish numerous measures to contain the cost of the cap-and-trade program, including allowing the use of domestic and international offsets, and the banking and borrowing of allowances; establishing a Carbon Market Efficiency Board empowered with certain cost-relief powers; and establishing a “cost-containment auction” of a fixed quantity of allowances each year that will initially be offered only to those with compliance obligations and within a certain price range. The bill also establishes a working group that will create regulations designed to protect the market from fraud and manipulation.
· The bill would provide funds to compensate low-income energy consumers and assist in worker transition.
· The bill would provide funding and incentives for development and deployment of geological carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology, with a goal of constructing 5-10 commercial coal-burning electricity facilities using CCS.
· The bill would also provide funds for: renewable energy; increasing the energy efficiency of buildings, appliances, manufacturing; research into low-carbon electricity generation and advanced energy projects; increasing the use and manufacture of hybrid and advanced vehicles; and increasing the production of cellulosic biofuels. It also includes a low-carbon fuel standard.
· The bill would provide funds for the states for mass transit projects, and wildlife conservation and adaptation projects, among others.
· The bill has a number of international provisions, including a measure that would require importers of certain commodities from countries that do not have GHG control programs to submit special allowances, as well as funds for assisting vulnerable communities abroad, promoting international technology development, and conserving forests and wildlife in other countries.
A resolution honoring Albert Arnold Gore Jr. and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, winners of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. The preamble language cites Vice President Gore's studies with climate scientist Roger Revelle, and recognizes that the IPCC "develops the scientific consensus necessary for humankind to address the challenges set forth by this crisis." Among other provisions, the resolution also declares that the United States House of Representatives affairs that human-induced climate change is "an urgent problem that must be confronted by all people of the world; and the United States House of Representatives accepts as its own challenge and calls upon citizens of the United States to find ways to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases that contribute to changing of Earth's climate, the peace, security and prosperity of this Nation and world demanding it."
Healthy Air and Clean Water Act. This bill would amend the Clean Air Act to establish a reduction program for mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants, and a trading system for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from such plants. It would cap CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants (including cogeneration facilities) that have a nameplate generation capacity of more than 25 megawatts. The bill would cap CO2 in 2015 at 2005 emissions levels for covered plants; at 75% of 2005 emissions in 2020; at 50% of 2005 emissions in 2030; at 35% of 2005 emissions in 2040; and at 20% of 2005 emissions in 2050. The bill would require the Administrator of the EPA to develop regulations for the trading system, though it would mandate that all emissions allowances be auctioned, with proceeds to be deposited into a special fund administered by the Department of Energy and the EPA to fund research and development of renewable energy projects.
The bill would also directs the Administrator of the EPA to promulgate regulations to reduce, by 2010, aggregate sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants by 75% from the levels allowed by the Clean Air Act; and aggregate nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants by 75% from 1997 levels. The bill would give the Administrator discretion over the means to achieve these reductions, and states that the Administrator may use market-based mechanisms, such as emissions trading.
In addition, the bill would require the Administrator to, not later than the end of 2010, submit to Congress a report identifying objectives for environmental indicators that are sufficient to protect and restore sensitive ecosystems including those of the Adirondack Mountains, mid-Appalachian Mountains, Catskill Mountains, Rocky Mountains, and Southern Blue Ridge Mountains and water bodies of the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, Long Island Sound, the Chesapeake Bay.